It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
ESR & Bethany Resources
Science & Technology Commons
Friends Collection & College Archives
Facilities & Services
BIO 464: Advanced Cell Physiology: Evaluating Sources
Sometimes it can be difficult to determine the quality of a particular reference you'd like to use in your paper. Here are some considerations to help you evaluate those sources.
Credibility/authority-Who is writing?Who is she/he affiliated with?What gives him/her the knowledge/understanding to write about the topic?
Currency/Timeliness- Is this resource current? Does it matter? Is there a more current resource out there?
Publisher- Who published this work?How do they accept/review/monitor the content that they publish? (i.e., do they peer review?)
Audience- Who will read this work?Who is the intended audience?Is the level of quality appropriate for the quality of your paper?
Format- Is this available print or electronically? How does it affect the audience (who will have access)? Is it free or fee-based?Does it matter?
Overview of evaluation guide
The credibility of your assignment rests on the credibility of the resources you have used in it to support your arguments. Before you include a resource in your assignment you will need to evaluate it to consider if it is appropriate for a university level assignment. Below is a figure that might help you further understand credibility of sources. For more information on evaluating authority, bias, accuracy, currency, utility and peer-review click on this link.